Home/Guides/RTI for Karnataka Board: SSLC & PUC Exam Results, Revaluation & Answer Sheet Copies
Karnataka

RTI for Karnataka Board: SSLC & PUC Exam Results, Revaluation & Answer Sheet Copies

File RTI with the Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board (KSEAB) to access SSLC/PUC exam results, revaluation status, answer sheet copies, school affiliation records, and exam irregularity complaint outcomes.

Updated 1 Jun 2026
Quick Facts
MinistryGovernment of Karnataka – Department of School Education
Address RTI ToState Public Information Officer, KSEAB, Bengaluru
Application Fee₹10 under RTI (Regulation of Fee and Cost) Rules, 2005. Free for BPL cardholders.
Response Time30 days (48 hours for life/liberty matters)
All information on this page is based on the Right to Information Act, 2005 (Act No. 22 of 2005) and the RTI (Regulation of Fee and Cost) Rules, 2005. First Appeal: Section 19(1). Second Appeal to CIC/SIC: Section 19(3).

The Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board (KSEAB) — now known as the Karnataka School Examination and Assessment Board (KSEAB) following its reconstitution — is the statutory body under the Government of Karnataka responsible for conducting the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (SSLC, Class 10) and the Pre-University Certificate (PUC, Class 11 and 12) examinations across the state. Every year, KSEAB oversees examinations for several million students, manages answer sheet evaluation, declares results, handles revaluation requests, and regulates the affiliation of secondary and pre-university schools across Karnataka's 31 districts.

For students, parents, and school administrators, KSEAB's decisions can have life-altering consequences — a failed SSLC result determines whether a student progresses to pre-university education, while a PUC result governs university admission and career choices. Despite this high-stakes role, KSEAB's processes — marking, revaluation, grace marks application, school inspections, and malpractice investigations — are not always transparent. KSEAB is a state public authority under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and is fully subject to the disclosure obligations of the Act. Citizens can use RTI to access precisely documented information on all of these processes without resorting to costly legal proceedings.

What KSEAB Records Are Accessible Under RTI?

The RTI Act, 2005, entitles citizens to inspect and obtain copies of records held by any public authority. For KSEAB, the following categories of records are obtainable via RTI under Section 6:

Evaluated Answer Sheets

The landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011) confirmed that evaluated answer sheets are "information" within the meaning of the RTI Act and must be disclosed to the candidate who appeared in the examination. KSEAB, as a state public authority, is bound by this ruling. A student can obtain:

  • A certified copy of the evaluated answer booklet(s) — with marks recorded question-by-question by the examiner — for any SSLC or PUC subject in which they appeared, by specifying the registration number, exam, year, and subject
  • Supplementary answer booklets, if any, that were used in the same examination
  • The total marks awarded per section or per question, as recorded by the examiner

This is particularly useful where a student suspects that some answers were left unmarked, that total marks were incorrectly carried over, or that the examiner's marks do not match the marks declared in the official result.

Revaluation Status and Outcomes

Students who apply for revaluation through KSEAB's official process can use RTI to verify that the revaluation was actually conducted and to obtain the marks recorded before and after revaluation. RTI can surface:

  • The marks awarded at the time of the original evaluation and the marks awarded after revaluation, for a specified registration number, subject, and exam year
  • The date on which revaluation was completed and the officer who authorised any change in marks
  • Whether a revised marksheet or certificate has been issued following revaluation, and if not, the reason for the delay

Passing Criteria and Grace Marks Policy

KSEAB applies specific rules on minimum passing marks per subject, aggregate passing conditions, and a grace marks scheme to assist students on the margin. RTI can provide:

  • The complete subject-wise passing criteria for a specific SSLC or PUC examination year
  • The grace marks policy — the number of grace marks permissible, the subjects to which they may be applied, the order of application, and the conditions that must be met for grace marks to be granted
  • Any special provisions applicable to SC/ST/OBC/differently-abled candidates

School Affiliation Records and Inspection Reports

KSEAB affiliates secondary and pre-university schools across Karnataka, conducts periodic inspections, and can suspend or cancel affiliation for non-compliance. Under RTI, citizens can access:

  • The current affiliation status of any KSEAB-affiliated school — whether affiliation is valid, expired, provisionally granted, or cancelled
  • The date of initial affiliation and the dates of all subsequent renewals
  • Copies of inspection reports prepared following KSEAB's inspection of a school in the last three to five years
  • Show-cause notices, cancellation notices, or other disciplinary communications issued to the school, and the outcome of any proceedings initiated

This information is valuable for parents evaluating schools, for students checking whether their school's affiliation will be valid at the time of their examination, and for researchers and journalists tracking school quality.

Exam Malpractice and Irregularity Data

KSEAB has a dedicated mechanism for detecting and acting on exam malpractice — use of unfair means during SSLC and PUC examinations — including debarment of candidates and, in serious cases, referral to law enforcement. RTI can provide:

  • Aggregate malpractice case data broken down by exam (SSLC / PUC I / PUC II), district, and category of irregularity for a specified financial year
  • The number of candidates debarred, the duration of debarment, and the number of FIRs registered
  • The action taken on complaints about invigilator misconduct or paper leak allegations received from the public
  • Whether any inquiry or investigation was ordered in connection with a specific examination centre or district, and the outcome of such inquiry

How to File RTI with KSEAB

Step 1: Identify the Specific Information You Need

Determine precisely what you want — a copy of your answer sheet, the status of your revaluation, the school's affiliation status, or malpractice statistics. Frame each request as a numbered, specific question. Avoid vague requests such as "provide all records related to my result" — specific, numbered queries receive faster and more complete responses under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act.

Step 2: Draft Your Application

Use the sample RTI application provided above as the base. Fill in the exam details: your registration number, the examination name (SSLC / PUC I / PUC II), the year of examination, and the subject name and code. For school-related queries, include the school name, KSEAB school code, and the district. Address the application to the State Public Information Officer (SPIO), KSEAB, Bengaluru.

Step 3: File Online or in Person

KSEAB is a Karnataka state public authority. You may file your RTI application by visiting KSEAB's portal at kseab.karnataka.gov.in or by submitting a physical application by registered post or in person to the SPIO at KSEAB's office in Bengaluru. Pay the ₹10 application fee by Indian Postal Order, demand draft in favour of "Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board," or as directed on the portal. Citizens holding a valid BPL card are exempt from the fee — attach a copy of the card with your application.

Step 4: Track Your Application

The SPIO is required to respond within 30 days of receipt of your application under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. If the information sought touches on life or liberty — for example, if a result error is directly affecting a student's immediate admission or livelihood — the deadline under the Section 7(1) proviso is 48 hours. Keep the acknowledgement slip or postal tracking reference as proof of filing.

Step 5: Appeal if Needed

If KSEAB does not respond within 30 days, or the response is incomplete, evasive, or constitutes a wrongful denial:

  • First Appeal under Section 19(1): File with the First Appellate Authority (FAA) designated within KSEAB, within 30 days of the date of the decision or expiry of the 30-day response period, whichever is applicable. No fee is required for the first appeal.
  • Second Appeal under Section 19(3): If the FAA also fails to respond satisfactorily, file a Second Appeal with the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) — constituted under Section 15 of the RTI Act as the state information commission for all Karnataka state public authorities — within 90 days of the FAA's decision or the expiry of the FAA's period. The KIC can direct KSEAB to provide the information and impose a personal penalty of ₹250 per day (up to ₹25,000) on the SPIO under Section 20 of the RTI Act for willful denial or delay.

Understanding the Appeal Path: KSEAB is a Karnataka State Body

KSEAB is a state public authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005. All appeals arising from RTI applications to KSEAB remain entirely within the Karnataka state system:

  • First Appeal: First Appellate Authority (FAA), KSEAB, Bengaluru
  • Second Appeal: Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) — the state information commission constituted under Section 15 of the RTI Act for Karnataka

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has no jurisdiction over KSEAB or any other Karnataka state government body. Filing a second appeal with the CIC will result in it being returned as not maintainable. Always address second appeals to the KIC.

Tips for an Effective KSEAB RTI Application

  • Always include your registration number and exam year in any RTI about your personal result or answer sheet. KSEAB processes hundreds of thousands of answer sheets and without these identifiers the SPIO cannot locate the relevant record.
  • Specify subject codes, not just subject names, because KSEAB uses codes internally and the same subject name can correspond to different codes across streams.
  • Ask for certified copies of answer sheets and revaluation records — certified copies are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings and complaints to the KIC or courts.
  • File separate RTI applications for separate purposes — one for your personal answer sheet and a separate one for school affiliation records — to avoid one request slowing down the other.
  • Use RTI alongside, not instead of, the revaluation process: file the official revaluation application first; if you remain dissatisfied, RTI the answer sheet to verify whether the revaluation was conducted properly.
  • Cross-check marks: compare the marks recorded question-by-question on your answer sheet against the marks declared in your official result. Discrepancies — unmarked answers, totalling errors — are actionable both through appeal to the KIC and through the courts.

Sample RTI Application Draft

To, The State Public Information Officer (SPIO), Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board (KSEAB), Bengaluru Subject: Application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Evaluated Answer Sheet Copy, Revaluation Status, Passing Criteria, School Affiliation Records, Malpractice Case Data, and Marks Before/After Revaluation Sir/Madam, I, [Your Full Name], residing at [Your Full Address], submit this application under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and seek the following information: Applicant/Exam details (fill as applicable): Exam: [SSLC / PUC I / PUC II] Year of Examination: [YYYY] Registration Number: [Your Registration Number] Subject(s): [Subject Name(s) and Subject Code(s)] School Name and Code: [if applicable] Information sought: 1. A certified copy of the evaluated answer sheet(s) for the candidate bearing Registration Number [XXX] who appeared in the [SSLC / PUC II] examination of [Month/Year] for the subject [Subject Name, Code: XXX] — including all pages of the answer booklet(s) with marks awarded by the examiner(s) on each answer, question-wise marks, and any supplementary answer booklet(s) used. 2. The current status and final result of the revaluation application submitted by the candidate bearing Registration Number [XXX] for the [SSLC / PUC] [Month/Year] examination in the subject [Subject Name] — specifically: (a) the marks awarded before revaluation; (b) the marks awarded after revaluation; (c) the date on which revaluation was completed; and (d) whether the result or grade was revised consequent to the revaluation, and if so, the revised result. 3. The complete criteria used by KSEAB to determine passing and failing in the SSLC [Year] examination — including subject-wise minimum passing marks, aggregate passing conditions, the grace marks policy (number of grace marks permissible, subjects to which grace marks may be applied, and the conditions for applying grace marks), and any special passing conditions applicable to SC/ST/OBC/differently-abled candidates. 4. The affiliation status of [School Name], [School Address], bearing KSEAB School Code [XXX] — specifically: (a) whether the school's affiliation is valid and current; (b) the date of initial affiliation and most recent renewal; (c) whether any inspection of the school was conducted by KSEAB in the last three years, and if so, copies of all inspection reports; and (d) whether any show-cause notice, cancellation notice, or disciplinary action has been initiated against the school in the last three years, and the outcome thereof. 5. The total number of SSLC and PUC malpractice / exam irregularity cases detected during the examinations conducted in the financial year 2024-25 — broken down by (a) exam (SSLC / PUC I / PUC II); (b) district; and (c) category of irregularity (use of chits/mobile phone, impersonation, answer sheet tampering, invigilator misconduct, etc.) — and the action taken on each category of case, including the number of candidates debarred, the duration of debarment, and FIRs registered if any. 6. The marks awarded to the candidate bearing Registration Number [XXX] in the subject [Subject Name, Code: XXX] in the [SSLC / PUC II] [Month/Year] examination: (a) the original marks as declared in the result; and (b) the marks awarded after revaluation, if a revaluation was undertaken — along with the date of completion of the revaluation and the name and designation of the officer who authorised the revised marks. I am enclosing the application fee of ₹10 [via demand draft / Indian Postal Order / cash receipt / online payment reference no.: ________]. I request the above information within 30 days as required under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. Yours sincerely, [Your Full Name] [Your Complete Address] Phone: [Your 10-digit Mobile Number] Email: [[email protected]] Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]

Replace all text in [square brackets] with your actual details before filing. Do not include the brackets in your submission.

Frequently Asked Questions

Rather have us file it for you?

We research your case, identify the right department, draft the RTI with proven language, and file it on your behalf. Pay ₹149 + GST only after we've done the work.

File RTI — it's free to start
RTI SathiRTI Sathi
Making Right to Information accessible for every Indian citizen.

Disclaimer: RTI Sathi (rtisathi.com) is an independent, privately owned and operated service. We are not affiliated with, authorised by, or acting on behalf of the Government of India, any State Government, or any government ministry or department. We are not the official RTI portal. The official government portal for filing Central Government RTI applications is rtionline.gov.in.

© 2026 RTI Sathi · India
Direct Government Filing Service

Proudly made and operated with from Delhi, India